The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of identifiable and non-identifiable data linkage: health technology assessment of MitraClip using registry, administrative and mortality datasets
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Health & Care Informatics, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100223 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kim Keltie, Paola Cognigni, Sam Gross, Samuel Urwin, Julie Burn, Helen Cole, Lee Berry, Hannah Patrick, Andrew Sims |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,588,750
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#349
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,102
of 462,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.