| Title |
Live psychotherapy by video versus in‐person: A meta‐analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cpp.2594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ephrem Fernandez, Yilma Woldgabreal, Andrew Day, Tuan Pham, Bianca Gleich, Elias Aboujaoude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 15% |
| United States | 9 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Finland | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 87 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#356,780
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
#8
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,174
of 457,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.