↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007179.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Sameh Mortaz-Hejri, Mehdi Mehrani, Parham Sadeghipour

Abstract

Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection in the world. Several antibiotics, separately or in combination, have been tried for treatment of human brucellosis. The inconsistencies between different treatment regimens warrants the need for a systematic review to inform clinical practice and future research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Researcher 21 18%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 30 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,456,944
of 17,844,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,050
of 11,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,493
of 163,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,844,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.