↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007179.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Sameh Mortaz-Hejri, Mehdi Mehrani, Parham Sadeghipour

Abstract

Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection in the world. Several antibiotics, separately or in combination, have been tried for treatment of human brucellosis. The inconsistencies between different treatment regimens warrants the need for a systematic review to inform clinical practice and future research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,761,761
of 13,571,622 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,660
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,029
of 147,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,571,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.