↓ Skip to main content

In the opinion of scientists: are there rules in research? Pilot study on the most widespread rules of scientific research

Overview of attention for article published in Uniciencia, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In the opinion of scientists: are there rules in research? Pilot study on the most widespread rules of scientific research
Published in
Uniciencia, January 2021
DOI 10.15359/ru.35-1.17
Authors

Paula De la Lama-Zubirán, Alfredo De la Lama-García, Marcelo Del Castillo-Mussot

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 3 27%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,696,859
of 20,739,472 outputs
Outputs from Uniciencia
#77
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,776
of 330,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Uniciencia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,739,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them