You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of supplemental feeding on the fecal bacterial communities of Rocky Mountain elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0249521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire E. Couch, Benjamin L. Wise, Brandon M. Scurlock, Jared D. Rogerson, Rebecca K. Fuda, Eric K. Cole, Kimberly E. Szcodronski, Adam J. Sepulveda, Patrick R. Hutchins, Paul C. Cross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,176,417
of 24,931,592 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,665
of 216,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,400
of 433,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#711
of 2,987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,931,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.