↓ Skip to main content

Treatment Network Typologies and the Working Alliance of Clients with Serious Mental Illness

Overview of attention for article published in Society and Mental Health, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 171)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment Network Typologies and the Working Alliance of Clients with Serious Mental Illness
Published in
Society and Mental Health, April 2021
DOI 10.1177/21568693211001432
Authors

George S. Usmanov, Eric R. Wright, Raeda K. Anderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,246,229
of 22,172,124 outputs
Outputs from Society and Mental Health
#42
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,405
of 335,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society and Mental Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,172,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.