↓ Skip to main content

Causal assessment of smoking and tooth loss: A systematic review of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causal assessment of smoking and tooth loss: A systematic review of observational studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Hanioka, Miki Ojima, Keiko Tanaka, Keitaro Matsuo, Fumihito Sato, Hideo Tanaka

Abstract

Tooth loss impairs oral function. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the causal association between smoking and tooth loss on the basis of high-quality studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,046,477
of 4,697,597 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,950
of 5,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#892,674
of 3,596,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1,942
of 5,149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,697,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,596,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.