↓ Skip to main content

Pregabalin monotherapy for epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pregabalin monotherapy for epilepsy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009429.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Zhou, Jinou Zheng, Lu Yu, Xiaoyan Jia

Abstract

Many people with epilepsy suffer from poorly controlled seizures, despite current antiepileptic treatments. Due to high rates of treatment resistance, there is interest in new pharmacological treatment options such as pregabalin. However, it remains unclear whether existing evidence of pregabalin is rigorous enough to support its monotherapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,010,898
of 15,522,505 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,704
of 11,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,270
of 154,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,522,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.