↓ Skip to main content

Pregabalin monotherapy for epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pregabalin monotherapy for epilepsy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009429.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Zhou, Jinou Zheng, Lu Yu, Xiaoyan Jia

Abstract

Many people with epilepsy suffer from poorly controlled seizures, despite current antiepileptic treatments. Due to high rates of treatment resistance, there is interest in new pharmacological treatment options such as pregabalin. However, it remains unclear whether existing evidence of pregabalin is rigorous enough to support its monotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Psychology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,686,151
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,358
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,550
of 193,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.