↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D Griffiths, Gillian ML Gyte, Shantini Paranjothy, Heather C Brown, Hannah K Broughton, Jane Thomas

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms which are experienced commonly during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia and can also occur in the period following the procedure. 

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Turkey 2 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 173 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Other 15 8%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 25 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,263,318
of 15,561,399 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,910
of 11,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,885
of 154,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,561,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.