↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D Griffiths, Gillian ML Gyte, Shantini Paranjothy, Heather C Brown, Hannah K Broughton, Jane Thomas

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms which are experienced commonly during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia and can also occur in the period following the procedure. 

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Unspecified 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 53 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 60%
Unspecified 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 12 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,562,101
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,637
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,587
of 124,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.