| Title |
Reply to Inbar: Contextual sensitivity helps explain the reproducibility gap between social and cognitive psychology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1609700113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jay J. Van Bavel, Peter Mende-Siedlecki, William J. Brady, Diego A. Reinero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 38% |
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| Japan | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 34% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 53% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,443,923
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#28,161
of 101,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,481
of 365,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#415
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.