↓ Skip to main content

Standardized urine biomarkers in assessing neonatal kidney function: are we there yet?

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardized urine biomarkers in assessing neonatal kidney function: are we there yet?
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, September 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2021.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H. Mak, Carolyn L. Abitbol

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,505,637
of 18,823,067 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#456
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,686
of 327,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,823,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.