↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive assurance in three Neotropical species of Podostemaceae: strategies of self-pollination and the first report of apomixis1

Overview of attention for article published in Hoehnea, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproductive assurance in three Neotropical species of Podostemaceae: strategies of self-pollination and the first report of apomixis1
Published in
Hoehnea, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/2236-8906-21/2019
Authors

Inara Carolina da Silva-Batista, Cristiana Koschnitzke, Claudia Petean Bove

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#12,572,196
of 19,097,846 outputs
Outputs from Hoehnea
#17
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,999
of 327,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hoehnea
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,097,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them