You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a combined virtual reality, robotics and electrical stimulation intervention in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00851-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nahid Norouzi-Gheidari, Philippe S. Archambault, Katia Monte-Silva, Dahlia Kairy, Heidi Sveistrup, Michael Trivino, Mindy F. Levin, Marie-Hélène Milot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,554,120
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#741
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,692
of 435,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.