↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale ligand-based predictive modelling using support vector machines

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale ligand-based predictive modelling using support vector machines
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13321-016-0151-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Alvarsson, Samuel Lampa, Wesley Schaal, Claes Andersson, Jarl E. S. Wikberg, Ola Spjuth

Abstract

The increasing size of datasets in drug discovery makes it challenging to build robust and accurate predictive models within a reasonable amount of time. In order to investigate the effect of dataset sizes on predictive performance and modelling time, ligand-based regression models were trained on open datasets of varying sizes of up to 1.2 million chemical structures. For modelling, two implementations of support vector machines (SVM) were used. Chemical structures were described by the signatures molecular descriptor. Results showed that for the larger datasets, the LIBLINEAR SVM implementation performed on par with the well-established libsvm with a radial basis function kernel, but with dramatically less time for model building even on modest computer resources. Using a non-linear kernel proved to be infeasible for large data sizes, even with substantial computational resources on a computer cluster. To deploy the resulting models, we extended the Bioclipse decision support framework to support models from LIBLINEAR and made our models of logD and solubility available from within Bioclipse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,399,765
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#83
of 934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,168
of 366,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.