↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition & Learning, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments
Published in
Metacognition & Learning, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1
Authors

Christopher P. Dwyer, Michael J. Hogan, Ian Stewart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Lecturer 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 38%
Psychology 19 25%
Computer Science 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 13 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,382,698
of 13,027,452 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition & Learning
#5
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,529
of 144,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition & Learning
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,027,452 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them