↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition and Learning, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments
Published in
Metacognition and Learning, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1
Authors

Christopher P. Dwyer, Michael J. Hogan, Ian Stewart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 225 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Master 32 14%
Lecturer 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Researcher 16 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 71 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 46 20%
Psychology 29 13%
Computer Science 16 7%
Arts and Humanities 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 73 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,321,537
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#15
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,953
of 200,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.