You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous (CT-P13) and intravenous infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-regression of individual patient data from two randomised trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13075-021-02487-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bernard Combe, Yannick Allanore, Rieke Alten, Roberto Caporali, Patrick Durez, Florenzo Iannone, Michael T. Nurmohamed, Mondher Toumi, Sang Joon Lee, Taek Sang Kwon, Jiwon Noh, Gahee Park, Dae Hyun Yoo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 14% |
France | 1 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,943,918
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,610
of 3,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,583
of 437,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.