↓ Skip to main content

One-Third of Reef-Building Corals Face Elevated Extinction Risk from Climate Change and Local Impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
12 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1679 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-Third of Reef-Building Corals Face Elevated Extinction Risk from Climate Change and Local Impacts
Published in
Science, July 2008
DOI 10.1126/science.1159196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kent E. Carpenter, Muhammad Abrar, Greta Aeby, Richard B. Aronson, Stuart Banks, Andrew Bruckner, Angel Chiriboga, Jorge Cortés, J. Charles Delbeek, Lyndon DeVantier, Graham J. Edgar, Alasdair J. Edwards, Douglas Fenner, Héctor M. Guzmán, Bert W. Hoeksema, Gregor Hodgson, Ofri Johan, Wilfredo Y. Licuanan, Suzanne R. Livingstone, Edward R. Lovell, Jennifer A. Moore, David O. Obura, Domingo Ochavillo, Beth A. Polidoro, William F. Precht, Miledel C. Quibilan, Clarissa Reboton, Zoe T. Richards, Alex D. Rogers, Jonnell Sanciangco, Anne Sheppard, Charles Sheppard, Jennifer Smith, Simon Stuart, Emre Turak, John E. N. Veron, Carden Wallace, Ernesto Weil, Elizabeth Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,679 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Mexico 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
New Zealand 3 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Other 37 2%
Unknown 1573 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 314 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 292 17%
Student > Master 286 17%
Student > Bachelor 228 14%
Other 88 5%
Other 240 14%
Unknown 231 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 675 40%
Environmental Science 426 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 107 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 3%
Social Sciences 18 1%
Other 117 7%
Unknown 279 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#285,796
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,743
of 83,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#479
of 96,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.