↓ Skip to main content

Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
Published in
Nature Methods, April 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Necci, Damiano Piovesan, Silvio C. E. Tosatto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 39%
Chemistry 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Computer Science 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#700,160
of 19,998,134 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#947
of 4,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,618
of 329,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#27
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,998,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.