You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Necci, Damiano Piovesan, Silvio C. E. Tosatto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 21% |
| Italy | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 33 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 26 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 21% |
| Researcher | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#779,920
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,009
of 5,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,721
of 454,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.