You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the extent and distribution of evidence on effectiveness of systematic conservation planning around the globe? A systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0069-4 |
| Authors |
Emma J. McIntosh, Madeleine C. McKinnon, Robert L. Pressey, Richard Grenyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,124,675
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#85
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,069
of 371,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.