↓ Skip to main content

What is the extent and distribution of evidence on effectiveness of systematic conservation planning around the globe? A systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 166)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the extent and distribution of evidence on effectiveness of systematic conservation planning around the globe? A systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0069-4
Authors

Emma J. McIntosh, Madeleine C. McKinnon, Robert L. Pressey, Richard Grenyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 30%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 39%
Environmental Science 25 33%
Unspecified 10 13%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#810,412
of 12,818,243 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#34
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,309
of 263,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,818,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them