↓ Skip to main content

Biopolitical platforms: the perverse virtues of digital labour

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cultural Economy, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 460)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
91 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biopolitical platforms: the perverse virtues of digital labour
Published in
Journal of Cultural Economy, April 2021
DOI 10.1080/17530350.2021.1901766
Authors

Karen Gregory, Jathan Sadowski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#412,700
of 17,638,294 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cultural Economy
#3
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,279
of 191,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cultural Economy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,638,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them