You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Origins of Standing Stone Astronomy in Britain: New quantitative techniques for the study of archaeoastronomy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.025 |
Authors |
Gail Higginbottom, Roger Clay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Slovenia | 1 | 9% |
New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 13 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 363. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#87,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#28
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,893
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.