↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação de diretrizes clínicas brasileiras em oncologia: carências no rigor do desenvolvimento, aplicabilidade e independência editorial

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação de diretrizes clínicas brasileiras em oncologia: carências no rigor do desenvolvimento, aplicabilidade e independência editorial
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00031920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thais Piazza, Jans Bastos Izidoro, Marcos André Marques Portella Portella, Ulysses Panisset, Augusto Afonso Guerra-Júnior, Mariangela Leal Cherchiglia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,966,937
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#315
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,625
of 329,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them