You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The feasibility of the PAM intervention to support treatment-adherence in people with hypertension in primary care: a randomised clinical controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-88170-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aikaterini Kassavou, Venus Mirzaei, Sonia Shpendi, James Brimicombe, Jagmohan Chauhan, Debi Bhattacharya, Felix Naughton, Wendy Hardeman, Helen Eborall, Miranda Van Emmenis, Anna De Simoni, Amrit Takhar, Pankaj Gupta, Prashanth Patel, Cecilia Mascolo, Andrew Toby Prevost, Stephen Morris, Simon Griffin, Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant, Stephen Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,300,245
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#20,401
of 135,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,443
of 432,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#649
of 4,689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.