↓ Skip to main content

Presence or absence of cognitive complaints in Parkinson’s disease: mood disorder or anosognosia?

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presence or absence of cognitive complaints in Parkinson’s disease: mood disorder or anosognosia?
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pollyanna Celso F. Castro, Camila Catherine Aquino, André C. Felício, Flávia Doná, Leonardo M. I. Medeiros, Sônia M. C.A. Silva, Henrique Ballalai Ferraz, Paulo Henrique F. Bertolucci, Vanderci Borges

Abstract

We intended to evaluate whether non-demented Parkinsons's disease (PD) patients, with or without subjective cognitive complaint, demonstrate differences between them and in comparison to controls concerning cognitive performance and mood. We evaluated 77 subjects between 30 and 70 years, divided as follows: PD without cognitive complaints (n = 31), PD with cognitive complaints (n = 21) and controls (n = 25). We applied the following tests: SCOPA-Cog, Trail Making Test-B, Phonemic Fluency, Clock Drawing Test, Boston Naming Test, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Beck Depression Inventory. PD without complaints presented lower total score on Scales for outcome of Parkinson's disease-cognition as compared to controls (p = 0.048). PD with complaints group showed higher scores on HADS (p = 0.011). PD without complaints group showed poorer cognitive performance compared to controls, but was similar to the PD with complaints group. Moreover, this group was different from the PD without complaints and control groups concerning mood.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,867,987
of 12,539,922 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#291
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,384
of 262,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,539,922 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.