↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practiced intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Unspecified 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#158,531
of 12,550,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#389
of 10,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,048
of 12,009,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#381
of 9,893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,550,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,009,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.