↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem Jj Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder, Rubinstein SM, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW, Rubinstein, Sidney M, van Middelkoop, Marienke, Assendelft, Willem JJ, de Boer, Michiel R, van Tulder, Maurits W

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practiced intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 31%
Student > Master 11 28%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 23%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#135,630
of 8,862,686 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#391
of 8,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,979
of 8,235,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#391
of 8,717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,862,686 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,235,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.