↓ Skip to main content

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Many therapies exist for the treatment of low-back pain including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), which is a worldwide, extensively practiced intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 567 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 127 21%
Student > Bachelor 79 13%
Other 50 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 8%
Researcher 44 7%
Other 116 19%
Unknown 136 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 249 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 86 14%
Sports and Recreations 19 3%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Other 55 9%
Unknown 160 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#184,216
of 14,436,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#401
of 10,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,358
of 13,630,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#383
of 9,748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,436,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,630,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.