↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating nest supplementation as a recovery strategy for the endangered rodents of the Florida Keys

Overview of attention for article published in Restoration Ecology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating nest supplementation as a recovery strategy for the endangered rodents of the Florida Keys
Published in
Restoration Ecology, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/rec.12418
Authors

Michael V. Cove, Theodore R. Simons, Beth Gardner, Andrew S. Maurer, Allan F. O'Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 4 24%
Unspecified 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 65%
Unspecified 3 18%
Environmental Science 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,699,653
of 12,348,951 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#151
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,290
of 265,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#9
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.