You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Debjani Bhattacharyya. Empire and Ecology in the Bengal Delta: The Making of Calcutta; Sudipta Sen. Ganges: The Many Pasts of an Indian River; Sunil Amrith. Unruly Waters: How Rains, Rivers, Coasts, and Seas Have Shaped Asia’s History
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Historical Review, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ahr/rhab057 |
| Authors |
Sujit Sivasundaram |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,070,104
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from American Historical Review
#184
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,485
of 455,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Historical Review
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.