↓ Skip to main content

Investigating Vegetation Responses to Underground Nuclear Explosions Through Integrated Analyses

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating Vegetation Responses to Underground Nuclear Explosions Through Integrated Analyses
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, May 2021
DOI 10.1029/2020jg005831
Authors

Kurt C. Solander, Adam D. Collins, Erika Swanson, Ellis Q. Margolis, Brandon Crawford, Elizabeth Miller, Min Chen, Anita Lavadie‐Bulnes, Max Ryan, Isaac Borrego, Sanna Sevanto, Emily Schultz‐Fellenz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#10,855,625
of 19,553,318 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#826
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,389
of 335,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#59
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,553,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.