You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A wake-up call for preconception health: a clinical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp21x715733 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith Stephenson, Danielle AJM Schoenaker, William Hinton, Lucilla Poston, Mary Barker, Nisreen A Alwan, Keith Godfrey, Mark Hanson, Simon de Lusignan, Preconception Partnership |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 28% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,368,222
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#639
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,969
of 456,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.