You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of Zoonoses From Hunting and Use of Wildlife in North American Arctic and Boreal Biomes: Pandemic Potential, Monitoring, and Mitigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.627654 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy O. Keatts, Martin Robards, Sarah H. Olson, Karsten Hueffer, Stephen J. Insley, Damien O. Joly, Susan Kutz, David S. Lee, Cheryl-Lesley B. Chetkiewicz, Stéphane Lair, Nicholas D. Preston, Mathieu Pruvot, Justina C. Ray, Donald Reid, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Raphaela Stimmelmayr, Craig Stephen, Chris Walzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 82 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#797,583
of 24,254,113 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#366
of 12,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,113
of 431,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#18
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,254,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.