↓ Skip to main content

Practice Patterns for the Management of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Practice Patterns for the Management of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2698-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice C. Wei, Lakhbir Sandhu, Katharine S. Devitt, Anna R. Gagliardi, Erin D. Kennedy, David R. Urbach, Steve Gallinger, Nancy N. Baxter

Abstract

The optimal management of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRC-LM) has changed during the past two decades. However, clinical practice lags behind best evidence recommendations. We sought to characterize the gap between current practice and best evidence for the management of these patients and to identify barriers that hamper effective utilization of metastasectomy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Computer Science 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,172,971
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,474
of 6,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,534
of 183,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.