↓ Skip to main content

Melatonin can be, more effective than N-acetylcysteine, protecting acute lung injury induced by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in rat model

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melatonin can be, more effective than N-acetylcysteine, protecting acute lung injury induced by intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in rat model
Published in
Clinics, May 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Andrade Leite, Russel Joseph Reiter, Julio Cezar Mendes Brandão, Thiago Mamoru Sakae, Marcia Marinho, Celia Regina Camargo, Itamar Souza Oliveira-Junior

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Lecturer 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,349,071
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#547
of 1,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,389
of 456,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.