You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Measuring Altruistic Impact: A Model for Understanding the Social Justice of Open Access
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.7710/2162-3309.2132 |
Authors |
Margaret Heller, Franny Gaede |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
Australia | 5 | 9% |
Canada | 4 | 7% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 70% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 20% |
Scientists | 6 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 10 | 27% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 27% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 10 | 27% |
Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#857,238
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
#21
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,046
of 321,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them