↓ Skip to main content

Heracleum orphanidis: chemical characterisation, comparative evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity with specific interest in the influence on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Overview of attention for article published in Food & Function, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heracleum orphanidis: chemical characterisation, comparative evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity with specific interest in the influence on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
Published in
Food & Function, September 2016
DOI 10.1039/c6fo01018k
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ksenija S Mileski, Ana Ciric, Snezana Trifunovic, Mihailo S Ristic, Marina Sokovic, Vlado S Matevski, Vele Tešević, Milka Jadranin, Petar D. Marin, Ana M Dzamic, Ksenija S. Mileski, Ana D. Ćirić, Snežana S. Trifunović, Mihailo S. Ristić, Marina D. Soković, Vlado S. Matevski, Vele V. Tešević, Milka B. Jadranin, Ana M. Džamić

Abstract

GC-FID and GC-MS were used to determine the chemical composition of the essential oil of the aerial parts of Heracleum orphanidis Boiss. Also, the HPLC-DAD/ESI-ToF-MS profile of the methanol extracts of aerial parts and roots was determined. The main components of the essential oil were n-octanol, octyl hexanoate and n-octyl acetate, while coumarins were the most prevalent compounds in methanol extracts. An evaluation of antioxidant activity showed that the methanol and aqueous extracts of the aerial parts had the highest potential. In terms of antimicrobial activity determined by microdilution assays, the essential oil and methanol extract of the roots showed the greatest effectiveness. The colonies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 treated with H. orphanidis samples produced less toxic pyocyanin, showed lower twitching and flagella mobility and biofilm formatting was reduced. The analyses in this study showed the considerable biological potential of H. orphanidis considering free radicals and various pathogenic strains, including the wild type of P. aeruginosa.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Serbia 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Unspecified 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,381,002
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Food & Function
#1,797
of 4,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,328
of 321,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food & Function
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.