You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is a “real” artwork better than a reproduction? A meta-analysis of the genuineness effect.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1037/aca0000399 |
| Authors |
Eva Specker, Anna Fekete, MacKenzie D. Trupp, Helmut Leder |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 3 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 56% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,980,187
of 23,971,024 outputs
Outputs from Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
#85
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,360
of 225,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,971,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.