You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2020-107175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Owen M Bradfield, Alberto Giubilini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Italy | 7 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 138 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 218 | 79% |
| Scientists | 29 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#12,606
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#7
of 3,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#531
of 456,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.