↓ Skip to main content

How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
365 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
356 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Schwellnus, Torbjørn Soligard, Juan-Manuel Alonso, Roald Bahr, Ben Clarsen, H Paul Dijkstra, Tim J Gabbett, Michael Gleeson, Martin Hägglund, Mark R Hutchinson, Christa Janse Van Rensburg, Romain Meeusen, John W Orchard, Babette M Pluim, Martin Raftery, Richard Budgett, Lars Engebretsen

Abstract

The modern-day athlete participating in elite sports is exposed to high training loads and increasingly saturated competition calendar. Emerging evidence indicates that inappropriate load management is a significant risk factor for acute illness and the overtraining syndrome. The IOC convened an expert group to review the scientific evidence for the relationship of load-including rapid changes in training and competition load, competition calendar congestion, psychological load and travel-and health outcomes in sport. This paper summarises the results linking load to risk of illness and overtraining in athletes, and provides athletes, coaches and support staff with practical guidelines for appropriate load management to reduce the risk of illness and overtraining in sport. These include guidelines for prescription of training and competition load, as well as for monitoring of training, competition and psychological load, athlete well-being and illness. In the process, urgent research priorities were identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 365 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 220 18%
Student > Bachelor 152 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 10%
Researcher 91 8%
Other 83 7%
Other 226 19%
Unknown 315 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 381 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 216 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 2%
Other 95 8%
Unknown 349 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 359. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#91,678
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#247
of 6,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,936
of 356,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#9
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.