You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008496.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Hawke, Sean G Sadler, Hans Dieter Katzberg, Fereshteh Pourkazemi, Vivienne Chuter, Joshua Burns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 109 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 117 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#937,013
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,843
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,106
of 456,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.