↓ Skip to main content

Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-9-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

JL Hoving, MLA Broekhuizen, MHW Frings-Dresen

Abstract

Breast cancer management has improved dramatically in the past three decades and as a result, a population of working age women is breast cancer survivor. Interventions for breast cancer survivors have shown improvements in quality of life and in physical and psychological states. In contrast, efforts aimed at stimulating re-employment and return-to-work interventions for breast cancer survivors have not kept pace. The objective of this review was to study the effects and characteristics of intervention studies on breast cancer survivors in which the outcome was return to work.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 169 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 34%
Psychology 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 22 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,731,121
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,202
of 4,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,884
of 135,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#103
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.