You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
JL Hoving, MLA Broekhuizen, MHW Frings-Dresen |
| Abstract |
Breast cancer management has improved dramatically in the past three decades and as a result, a population of working age women is breast cancer survivor. Interventions for breast cancer survivors have shown improvements in quality of life and in physical and psychological states. In contrast, efforts aimed at stimulating re-employment and return-to-work interventions for breast cancer survivors have not kept pace. The objective of this review was to study the effects and characteristics of intervention studies on breast cancer survivors in which the outcome was return to work. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Psychology | 29 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,611,150
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,616
of 8,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,013
of 93,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.