↓ Skip to main content

“Isms” and “Zations”: on fictitious liquidity and endogenous financialization

Overview of attention for article published in Economia e Sociedade, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Isms” and “Zations”: on fictitious liquidity and endogenous financialization
Published in
Economia e Sociedade, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/1982-3533.2017v26n4art3
Authors

Jan Kregel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 57%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,277,869
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Economia e Sociedade
#37
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,415
of 337,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economia e Sociedade
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them