↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004714.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simpson TC, Needleman I, Wild SH, Moles DR, Mills EJ

Abstract

Glycaemic control is a key issue in the care of people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Some studies have suggested a bidirectional relationship between glycaemic control and periodontal disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
Germany 2 7%
Australia 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
New Zealand 1 4%
Unknown 17 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 256%
Unspecified 38 141%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 130%
Student > Bachelor 29 107%
Researcher 20 74%
Other 67 248%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 511%
Unspecified 49 181%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 96%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 33%
Other 24 89%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#938,101
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,938
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,545
of 120,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.