↓ Skip to main content

Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Prenatal Diagnosis, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,198)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors
Published in
Prenatal Diagnosis, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/pd.4002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Dan, Wei Wang, Jinghui Ren, Yali Li, Hua Hu, Zhengfeng Xu, Tze Kin Lau, Jianhong Xie, Weihua Zhao, Hefeng Huang, Jiansheng Xie, Luming Sun, Xiaohong Zhang, Weipeng Wang, Shixiu Liao, Rong Qiang, Jiangxia Cao, Qiufang Zhang, Yulin Zhou, Haiyan Zhu, Mei Zhong, Yi Guo, Linhua Lin, Zhiying Gao, Hong Yao, Hongyun Zhang, Lijian Zhao, Fuman Jiang, Fang Chen, Hui Jiang, Songgang Li, Yingrui Li, Jun Wang, Jian Wang, Tao Duan, Yue Su, Xiuqing Zhang

Abstract

To report the performance of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test based on cell-free DNA sequencing from maternal plasma in a routine clinical setting in China.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Unknown 124 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Other 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Unspecified 11 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 8 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#882,580
of 12,184,158 outputs
Outputs from Prenatal Diagnosis
#48
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,985
of 125,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prenatal Diagnosis
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,184,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.