↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive efficient compression of genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive efficient compression of genomes
Published in
Algorithms for Molecular Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-7188-7-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Wandelt, Ulf Leser

Abstract

: Modern high-throughput sequencing technologies are able to generate DNA sequences at an ever increasing rate. In parallel to the decreasing experimental time and cost necessary to produce DNA sequences, computational requirements for analysis and storage of the sequences are steeply increasing. Compression is a key technology to deal with this challenge. Recently, referential compression schemes, storing only the differences between a to-be-compressed input and a known reference sequence, gained a lot of interest in this field. However, memory requirements of the current algorithms are high and run times often are slow. In this paper, we propose an adaptive, parallel and highly efficient referential sequence compression method which allows fine-tuning of the trade-off between required memory and compression speed. When using 12 MB of memory, our method is for human genomes on-par with the best previous algorithms in terms of compression ratio (400:1) and compression speed. In contrast, it compresses a complete human genome in just 11 seconds when provided with 9 GB of main memory, which is almost three times faster than the best competitor while using less main memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Germany 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
France 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 27 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Master 8 22%
Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 39%
Engineering 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,383,652
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Algorithms for Molecular Biology
#59
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,507
of 179,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithms for Molecular Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them