You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A case study using the United Republic of Tanzania: costing nationwide HPV vaccine delivery using the WHO Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Costing Tool
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-136 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raymond Hutubessy, Ann Levin, Susan Wang, Winthrop Morgan, Mariam Ally, Theopista John, Nathalie Broutet |
Abstract |
The purpose, methods, data sources and assumptions behind the World Health Organization (WHO) Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Costing (C4P) tool that was developed to assist low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with planning and costing their nationwide human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program are presented. Tanzania is presented as a case study where the WHO C4P tool was used to cost and plan the roll-out of HPV vaccines nationwide as part of the national comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control strategy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Mauritius | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 263 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 51 | 19% |
Student > Master | 51 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 15% |
Unknown | 61 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 78 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,745,741
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,229
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,410
of 181,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#22
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.