You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
いじめ場面を想定したキャッチボール課題における傍観行動の選択肢の導入効果
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Transactions of Human Interface Society, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.11184/his.23.2_227 |
Authors |
植田 智之, 中西 惇也, 伴 碧, 倉本 到, 馬場 惇, 吉川 雄一郎, 石黒 浩 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,599,920
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from The Transactions of Human Interface Society
#20
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,525
of 462,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Transactions of Human Interface Society
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them