↓ Skip to main content

The mismatch between current statistical practice and doctoral training in ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 2,351)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
417 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
The mismatch between current statistical practice and doctoral training in ecology
Published in
Ecosphere, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1394
Authors

Justin C. Touchon, Michael W. McCoy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 417 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 269 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 30%
Student > Master 53 18%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 27 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 51%
Environmental Science 78 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 42 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 274. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#69,988
of 17,634,657 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#10
of 2,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,075
of 272,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#3
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,634,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.