↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Comparing traditional, immersive simulation with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in postgraduate year 2 anesthesiology residents

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Simulation, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing traditional, immersive simulation with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in postgraduate year 2 anesthesiology residents
Published in
Advances in Simulation, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41077-021-00174-0
Pubmed ID
34039446
Authors

Erin E. Blanchard, Lee Ann Riesenberg, Lisa B. Bergman, Michelle R. Brown, Emma C. O’Hagan, Shivani J. Patel, Tekuila R. Carter

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,853,381
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#124
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,891
of 448,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.