You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diet of the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes in Australia: analysis of temporal and spatial patterns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammal Review, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/mam.12251 |
| Authors |
Patricia A. Fleming, Heather M. Crawford, Alyson M. Stobo‐Wilson, Stuart J. Dawson, Christopher R. Dickman, Shannon J. Dundas, Matthew N. Gentle, Thomas M. Newsome, Julie O’Connor, Russell Palmer, Joanna Riley, Euan G. Ritchie, James Speed, Glen Saunders, John‐Michael D. Stuart, Eilysh Thompson, Jeff M. Turpin, John C.Z. Woinarski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 14 | 22% |
| Spain | 7 | 11% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 80% |
| Scientists | 11 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#848,230
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Review
#74
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,864
of 460,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Review
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.