↓ Skip to main content

Sa467 THE MODIFIED MULTIPLIER SES-CD (MM-SES-CD) PERFORMS BETTER THAN THE SES-CD FOR PREDICTION OF ENDOSCOPIC REMISSION IN CROHN'S DISEASE

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Sa467 THE MODIFIED MULTIPLIER SES-CD (MM-SES-CD) PERFORMS BETTER THAN THE SES-CD FOR PREDICTION OF ENDOSCOPIC REMISSION IN CROHN'S DISEASE
Published in
Gastroenterology, May 2021
DOI 10.1016/s0016-5085(21)01923-5
Authors

Neeraj Narula, Emily C. Wong, Jean Frederic Colombel, William J. Sandborn, John K. Marshall, Marco Daperno, Walter Reinisch, Parambir Dulai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#11,110
of 12,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,331
of 453,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#151
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.