You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Conceptualising global health: theoretical issues and their relevance for teaching
|
---|---|
Published in |
Globalization and Health, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-8-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mike Rowson, Chris Willott, Rob Hughes, Arti Maini, Sophie Martin, J Jaime Miranda, Vicki Pollit, Abi Smith, Rae Wake, John S Yudkin |
Abstract |
There has long been debate around the definition of the field of education, research and practice known as global health. In this article we step back from attempts at definition and instead ask what current definitions tell us about the evolution of the field, identifying gaps and points of debate and using these to inform discussions of how global health might be taught. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Uganda | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 196 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
Researcher | 19 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 55 | 27% |
Unknown | 29 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 36 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,892,110
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#306
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,367
of 192,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them